Christasha McNeil vs Salma Drugdova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Nov at 03:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. McNeil vs S. Drugdova

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McNeil 1 - 0 Drugdova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Christasha McNeil winning 2 and Salma Drugdova winning 0. The last match between Christasha McNeil and Salma Drugdova was at the W50 Austin, 11-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Christasha McNeil getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McNeil | 1 |
| Drugdova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W50 Austin(11-11-25)
C. McNeil vs S. Drugdova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.09% (39-27) | Career Total W/L | 54.71% (93-77) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. McNeil vs S. Drugdova Match Preview:
- Christasha Mc Neil has a slightly better second serve point win rate in the last six months, with 40.11% compared to Salma Drugdova's 38.08%. Does this suggest Mc Neil can rely on her second serve more effectively? Yes, it gives her a slight edge in serve performance.
- Salma Drugdova, however, excels in return games, winning 50.87% of points on her opponent's second serves, superior to Mc Neil’s 45.05%. Can Drugdova leverage this advantage in return games to potentially break Mc Neil’s serve more often? It seems very plausible.
- When facing first serves, Drugdova again outshines Mc Neil with a return point win rate of 37.12% compared to Mc Neil’s 30.96%, highlighting a strength in Drugdova’s return game.
- Both players are comparable under pressure, with Salma Drugdova having a slight edge in saving breakpoints at 47.38% versus Mc Neil’s 45.95%.
- Over the last year, Mc Neil has a higher match win rate at 58.00% compared to Drugdova's 54.29%, presenting Mc Neil as a slightly more consistent performer overall.
- Surface preferences show Christasha Mc Neil excelling on indoor hard courts with a 77% win rate, while Salma Drugdova’s best performance is also on hard surfaces with the same win rate. The upcoming match environment will be significant.
- Drugdova has played against stronger opponents over the past year with an average ranking of 362.54, compared to Mc Neil’s 438.54. Can this experience against higher-caliber opponents provide Drugdova with an advantage? It might contribute significantly to her competitiveness.
- In deciding sets, Mc Neil is much more effective, winning 67% compared to Drugdova’s 36%, indicating resilience in tight situations.
- While Mc Neil is effective in converting break points with a rate of 40.52%, Drugdova surpasses her slightly at 43.32%, implying potential success when given opportunities to break serve.
Editorial Prediction (November 11, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the recent performance data of both players, Christasha Mc Neil shows a slight benefit when it comes to overall match wins and her second serve success. However, Salma Drugdova demonstrates superior return capabilities, especially against first serves, which can be critical in a head-to-head matchup.
The players' breakpoint-saving and conversion statistics are fairly similar, though Drugdova's marginally better conversion rate could give her an incremental advantage during crucial moments. Despite Mc Neil’s better deciding set performance, this match may heavily depend on return play and the ability to handle high-pressure situations.
Considering the ability to play against higher-ranked opponents and drugdova’s resilience during breakpoint opportunities, she might have a viable edge in applying pressure on Mc Neil’s service games.
Based on these considerations, Salma Drugdova appears to be the more likely winner for this upcoming tennis match, given her strong return game and experience against quality opponents.
Christasha McNeil vs Salma Drugdova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. McNeil vs S. Drugdova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:1:34 | Average Match Time | 1:1:34 |
| 80% (24/30) | 1st Serve % | 51% (26/51) |
| 54% (13/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (20/26) |
| 50% (3/6) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 47% (24/51) | Return Points Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. McNeil Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-2 | ||
S. Drugdova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 7-5 7-6(6) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-1 | ||

C. McNeil vs S. Drugdova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.09% (39/27) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.71% (93/77) |
| 56.58% (86/66) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.96% (211/180) |
| 52.24% (723/661) | Games Win/Loss | 52.30% (1901/1734) |
| 57.58% (19/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.67% (54/35) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.24% (35/32) |
| 76.92% (10/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 112 | Aces Total | 210 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.56 |
| 173 | Total Double Faults | 993 |
| 1:27:46 | Average Match Time | 1:41:15 |
| 136.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 441.98 |
| 59% (2167/3695) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6431/10623) |
| 64% (1391/2167) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (3951/6431) |
| 47% (721/1528) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1746/4192) |
| 50% (218/434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (730/1413) |
| 44% (1645/3708) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5113/10688) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (19/19) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (32/32) |
| 74.07% (20/7) | Futures W/L | 57.55% (61/45) |
| 59% (39/66) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (92/169) |
| 23% (3/13) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (20/41) |
| 60% (12/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (26/52) |
| 89% (37/33) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (94/76) |
| 11% (37/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (94/18) |
| 21% (29/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (76/17) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
